If true, this would be quite damning. The question is: “que bono”? With Signature Bank it is easy: the government wants to rid the financial system of anything to do with cryptocurrency. But with SVB it is more curious given that the bank leaned far to the left. One possible explanation is that elements inside the government want to nationalize as much of banking as they can. That is definitely the trend with our Marxist DC elite “betters”. They have been trying their best to takeover health care, media and energy. Control of these four key industries means almost total control over the people.