The Media’s Unbearable Moralizing

In 2008 the media shed any semblance of objectivity and crossed over to advocacy. It has been getting worse every year, to the point that it has completely disgraced itself this year. It has highlighted every Trump flaw while virtually ignoring Hillary Clinton’s mistakes, criminal activity, and often despicable behavior. She being possibly the most corrupt Presidential nominee in US history.

The leftist media has the temerity to rail against what it perceives as hatred, various “-isms”, incompetence and belligerence, but readily traffics in its own hatred, “-isms”, and belligerence while ignoring gross incompetence on its own side. Leftists project, that is what they do. They are truly comical. They are only for rights, liberty, values and tolerance if it meets their leftist sensibility. As a consequence trust in media is falling by the day and may eventually destroy them. Unfortunately it will probably not be enough to save the country from the disaster of Hillary Clinton as President.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/19/the-lefts-hypocritical-moralizing-about-trump-has-become-unbearable/

 

A Simple Way Out of Trump and Hillary

Not that it would work. Should Clinton get the most votes or electoral votes, the left would riot if Congress would elect another, or put excruciating pressure on Democratic Congressmen. Ditto for Trump supporters, though I suspect it would be more measured.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/14/stupid-simple-way-trump-vs-hillary-2016/

 

Holier Than Thou

Holier than Them

 

Far-left Tries To Manipulate Catholics

Religions need to start suing the corrupt left-wing US government. Separation of church and state dictates that government must keep hands off, not vice-versa. This is unconstitutional behavior, and highly unethical. The left has declared war on Christianity in this country, but not surprisingly other far more dangerous religions.

http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/about-those-unthinking-backward-catholics

 

Does Common Sense Polling Point to a Trump Win?

If this analysis is accurate, polling is either flawed, skewed or fraudulent. In other words meant to suppress conservative voting.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/does_common_sense_plus_polling_mean_a_big_trump_win.html

At any rate, I implore anyone who is appalled by the thought of a Clinton Presidency to vote and vote against her. No matter Trump’s potential warts, Clinton has no business being President. She is dishonest, self-interested, has repeated violated the law, has never shown any particular competence as a senator or Secretary of State, is old, corrupt and possibly ill.

 

A Well Thought Case For Trump and Against Clinton

Conrad Black: The first one-on-one between Clinton and Trump was an even, if disappointing, debate

For the United States, the last 20 years have been a multiple disaster — in the Middle East, endless war, national fragmentation and humanitarian tragedy; the greatest economic debacle since the 1930s; the admission of millions of unskilled peasants into the country illegally; doubling the national debt of 233 years in seven years to achieve annual economic growth of one per cent; and truckling to Iranian sectarian zealotry and sponsorship of terrorism while the entire alliance system has putrefied. President Obama and secretary Clinton have led the West to make common cause with the Russians and Iranians in the remnants of Iraq that both Bushes invaded, while exchanging fire in the neighboring rubble heap of Syria with the same Russians and Iranians. It is impossible to imagine any American president of living memory conducting the West into such a ludicrous crossfire.

One member or another of the Bush and Clinton families was president, vice-president, or secretary of state for eight straight terms (1981-2013) and both families put up candidates for the White House this year. The Adams and Roosevelts had distinguished presidents 20 years apart, and Teddy Roosevelt and FDR were sixth cousins and in different parties. This recent handing around of the nation’s highest offices almost without interruption for decades is not based on dazzling merit and has become, as Hillary Clinton’s endless falsehoods suggest, a corrupt practice. (Obama only managed to intrude into this bi-regency because the Democratic party’s grandees, the unelected ex officio delegates to the Democratic convention in 2008, concluded that it was time for a non-white president. The conclusion was the right one but the beneficiary of it was not.)